iPod nano - Hit or Miss?
Apple's sexy new member of the iPod family - the iPod nano, has been introduced to pretty much unanimous applause. Critics love it and it would seem that the nano is going to take the crown from the iPod mini as the most popular Apple music player. But how does it compare to the other iPods available? Will it rock your world?
Nano Nano
The original iPod's are hard disk based devices. Available in two sizes at the moment - 20GB and 60GB. They are charged and sync to iTunes, Apple's music library software via the speedy Firewire cable. They can hold thousands of music tracks and also can hold your pictures, which can be shown right on your TV as a slide show. This is the machine that started the iPod generation. It offers supreme audio quality and an intuitive user interface. The new iPod nano uses flash based memory instead of a hard drive. This is solid-state and will consume less battery juice but at the moment is available in the nano as 2GB or 4GB sizes. One of the biggest 'complaints' of the iPod nano, is that it uses USB connectivity. This is a lot slower than FireWire but is more widely supported by PC manufacturers. So it is a double edged sword. FireWire may be unnecessary too, as Flash based memory has slower read and write times than the hard disks in their larger siblings.
Grandmaster Flash
The great thing about Flash memory is the small size and weight. It also has no moving parts. This makes it possible to make the nano slip into your jeans pocket, it also means if you go for a jog, it will not skip or jump like you do. The increased battery life will mean it lasts as long as you do too. This isn't the first flash based iPod, the iPod shuffle was the first Apple music player to shun hard drives. It is cheap and light but does not have a display so you are in the dark. Apple were keen to point out that "Life is Random" though and for me. I could live with that - I like the way that the shuffle feature will create 'surprising' playlists. Combining different genres of music in ways that most DJ's would try to avoid. I still find it amazing how your mood can be influenced by these changes of tempo and subject matter. Yeah - random is good but so is the nano. You can shuffle your nano music too, but if you choose, you can flick through your music library on it's tiny colour screen. It will also hold your images too, so you can show your friends some of your favourite pictures - something you could never do with an iPod shuffle.
Pretty Vacant
The iPod nano also boasts a certain "Wow Factor". It is incredibly small and is another stunning design from the clever Cupertino designers. It makes a regular iPod look like brick in comparison. Which is quite an achievement as the iPod was often bought as a fashion accessory - more gorgeous than Gucci and more voluptuous than Versace. This new Super Model is more waif like than any Rizla-thin cat walk superstar. It also can take more abuse and is cheaper to run. So from a 'lifestyle' point of view the nano is a gem.
More than just a pretty face
The iPod nano introduces some new features to the iPod ifamily. A stopwatch which could be useful training aid or to time hot laps round the car park. World Clock which will keep any jet-set iPod heads happy and in sync and a screen-lock feature, to keep unwelcome grubby fingers from touching your pride and joy. What really sets the nano apart though is the slinky form factor. It sets new standards for music players everywhere. In last months Stuff Magazine, much was written about the latest generation of iPod contenders from Sony and other manufacturers. Hinting that Apple may be losing their golden touch and the new bucks would be fighting for Apple's crown. The nano has sledge-hammered any take-over attempts and shown the world once again that Apple is the real deal, it is the king of music machines, and in the ultra competitive music player market have set new standards of design and wow, that Sony and others can only imitate.
iPod - the musician's choice?
As a musician, I love my iPod. I use a 30GB model. It carries my music collection and is a very useful mixing tool. I can check my mixes in my car and of course using the standard iPod headphones. This is very important as I know that a large percentage of listeners will play my music on their iPod. It's like having a pair virtual Yamaha NS10 studio monitors - almost standard issue for recording studios. I can do several different mixes - different eq and compression, to see which mix is the best and most compatible. The iPod nano could of course be used in this capacity. It lacks a remote connector though, so I can't plug my Griffin iTalk into it to record any song ideas. My ideal iPod would have a built in mic and even line inputs. My iPod pro would record uncompressed audio and would be skinned in brushed aluminium like my Apple PowerBook and Cinema Display.
iPod nano - hit or miss?
Well for me the iPod nano may not be my ideal iPod - but I still want one. It doesn't hold as much audio as my existing iPod- but I still want one. It uses the slower than FireWire USB - but I still want one. The only thing left to decide is which colour - Back in Black would suit me - rock on Apple.
You can buy the iPod nano from the UK Apple Store.
