<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>

<feed xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" version="0.3" xml:lang="en-GB">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16199931" rel="service.post" title="iPod and iTunes Reviews" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16199931" rel="service.feed" title="iPod and iTunes Reviews" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">iPod and iTunes Reviews</title>
<tagline mode="escaped" type="text/html"/>
<link href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/" rel="alternate" title="iPod and iTunes Reviews" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16199931</id>
<modified>2006-12-07T16:01:33Z</modified>
<generator url="http://www.blogger.com/" version="6.72">Blogger</generator>
<info mode="xml" type="text/html">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This is an Atom formatted XML site feed. It is intended to be viewed in a Newsreader or syndicated to another site. Please visit the <a href="http://help.blogger.com/bin/answer.py?answer=697">Blogger Help</a> for more info.</div>
</info>
<convertLineBreaks xmlns="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">false</convertLineBreaks>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16199931/116550117225160004" rel="service.edit" title="A pair of Apple Remotes" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<author>
<name>Richard Senior</name>
</author>
<issued>2006-12-07T13:54:00+00:00</issued>
<modified>2006-12-07T16:01:33Z</modified>
<created>2006-12-07T14:19:32Z</created>
<link href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/2006/12/pair-of-apple-remotes.html" rel="alternate" title="A pair of Apple Remotes" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16199931.post-116550117225160004</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">A pair of Apple Remotes</title>
<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:base="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/" xml:space="preserve">&lt;img src="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/a/i/stuff/apple-remote.jpg" alt="Apple Remote" /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Apple Remote is a very beautiful thing. Small and light, it feels just right in your hand. Although made from cheap plastic it seems as plush (but nowhere near as heavy) as my Bang &amp; Olufsen remote. It works really well, you don't even need to point it at your &lt;a href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/2006/03/ipod-hi-fi-boom-box.html"&gt;iPod Hi-Fi&lt;/a&gt; or FrontRow equipped Mac to get it to work... which creates a little problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I set up my iPod Hi-Fi in my bedroom, along with my wife's new 24inch iMac. So I tried to turn up the volume of my Hi-Fi and you've guessed it the Mac goes up accordingly. So what to do?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;To set your iPod Hi-Fi to work only with the included remote:&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Connect your iPod Hi-Fi to an electrical outlet. If your iPod Hi-Fi has batteries, you do not need to connect it to an outlet.
Make sure other products that are compatible (see above) with the remote are not in range, and hold the remote close to your iPod Hi-Fi (about 3 to 4 inches away).
Press and hold the Menu and Next/Fast-forward buttons on the remote simultaneously for about six seconds. The status light blinks green several times. Your iPod Hi-Fi now works only with the paired remote.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Learn more from &lt;a href="http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303347"&gt;Apple&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can also pair the remote with your iMac or other Apple Remote equipped device in a similar manner. The only problem being is trying to remember which remote is which. My solution was to leave the shiny plastic protective wrapper on the iMac remote, but a permanent marker could also be used.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I reckon that someone will eventually make some nifty icon stickers for this purpose... except I have just copywritten the idea! lol&lt;/p&gt;</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16199931/116315274682126583" rel="service.edit" title="Zune - iPod Killer Mk2" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<author>
<name>Richard Senior</name>
</author>
<issued>2006-11-10T09:47:00+00:00</issued>
<modified>2006-11-13T19:25:37Z</modified>
<created>2006-11-10T09:59:06Z</created>
<link href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/2006/11/zune-ipod-killer-mk2.html" rel="alternate" title="Zune - iPod Killer Mk2" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16199931.post-116315274682126583</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Zune - iPod Killer Mk2</title>
<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:base="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/" xml:space="preserve">&lt;img src="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/a/i/stuff/zune-ipod-killer.jpg" alt="Zune from Microsoft" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Apple monopoly over digital media players is set to fall if Microsoft's plans fall into place. Their new Zune device has a 30GB hard disk, and is available in iPod white and black, and in a rare case of Microsoft innovation, erm,  brown...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;Microsoft's iPod Killer MK1 - PlaysForSure&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PlaysForSure (catchy name) was Microsoft's MK1 iPod killer. Like the Windows operating system, Microsoft coded it, and waited for the rush of developers to make devices that could utilise it. Zune is their MK2 iPod killer, it has also killed off PlaysForSure too, as songs from this system will not work on Zune.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Microsoft is starting over. Never mind all the poor slobs who bought big PlaysForSure music collections. Never mind the PlaysForSure companies who now find themselves competing with their former leader. Their reward for buying into Microsoft's original vision? A great big 'So long, suckas!'

It was bad enough when there were two incompatible copy-protection standards: iTunes and PlaysForSure. Now there will be three. 

(Although Microsoft is shutting its own PlaysForSure music store next week, it insists that the PlaysForSure program itself will live on.)&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/09/technology/09pogue.html?_r=1&amp;ref=technology&amp;oref=slogin"&gt;NY Times - David Pogue&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, what happens when they kill Zune off? Will iPod killer MK3 support Zune files? Who knows but I wouldn't risk buying one. Even if I could as Zune is not available in the UK yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;The Zune Social Club&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One thing that that does seperate Zune from the iPod is it's wireless capabilities, it can be used to transmit music (and photos) to other Zune users, albeit for 3 days, then it wipes the tune - even if it was your own recording, this is just not for DRM protected files! It also has an FM Radio built in, and a bigger screen than the iPod.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What gets me though is what makes the iPod special to me, is the AddressBook and iCal intergration, plus the use of the iPod hard drive as a portable data carrier. Zune won't do this. It also doesn't work with Windows Media Player, you have to use a similar but less powerful player that Microsoft have developed to work with the Zune.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The iPod may not be perfect, but I really can't see Zune killing it off, I'll wait for the 3rd generation of iPod Killer, but I won't hold my breath.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.macidol.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6607"&gt;Zune Discussion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16199931/116225896626824898" rel="service.edit" title="iPod Hi-Fi Review" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<author>
<name>Richard Senior</name>
</author>
<issued>2006-10-31T01:01:00+00:00</issued>
<modified>2006-11-09T20:22:11Z</modified>
<created>2006-10-31T01:42:46Z</created>
<link href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/2006/10/ipod-hi-fi-review.html" rel="alternate" title="iPod Hi-Fi Review" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16199931.post-116225896626824898</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">iPod Hi-Fi Review</title>
<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:base="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/" xml:space="preserve">&lt;img src="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/i/stuff/apple-ipod-hi-fi-boom-box.jpg" alt="Apple iPod Hi-Fi" alt="Apple iPod Hi-Fi with iPod and Apple Remote" /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I finally caved in and bought an &lt;a href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/2006/03/ipod-hi-fi-boom-box.html"&gt;Apple iPod Hi-Fi&lt;/a&gt;. I wanted something to replace my somewhat limited passive Sony speakers, &lt;a href="http://www.macidol.com/music/world/dub/"&gt;dub&lt;/a&gt; don't really rock my boat on these tinny, but useful Sony mini speakers. I hoped to find that the iPod Hi-Fi would give me a decent sound for my bedroom, kitchen and living room. &lt;strong&gt;So, am I,  a happy Apple iPod Hi-Fi customer?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Burn the grill&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The iPod Hi-Fi comes with a protective/decorative grill, which needn't have been in the box, apart from when your carrying it about. So, on second thoughts, keep it safe, and use it when you travel. The Apple iPod Hi-Fi sound opens up when you remove the grill, particularly at low volume levels. A lot of the high end air seems to be lost when donning the iPod Hi-Fi speaker grill. Without the grill the iPod Hi-Fi's sound is well rounded, a very polished audio performer. Don't know if they'll replace my Yamaha NS10 Studio Monitors, but this is a very solid performer. Great for hotel room mixing sessions and on the tour bus.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Hi-Fi not as we know it, Jim&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is a new definition of Hi-Fi according to Apple, and I somewhat agree. Sure it ain't got the potential for a truly wide stereo spread, as even my little Sony's. But it sounds polished, deep and full even at low volume, making it &lt;strong&gt;ideal&lt;/strong&gt; for round the house. Buy a few spare power leads, to leave strategically round your house, and before you can say &lt;strong&gt;BASS&lt;/strong&gt; you have a very capable, easily carried, sound system. The included Apple Remote makes it Homer friendly, and the remote works, quickly with a pleasant snap, next track. Boom Box anyone?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Plays nice with other iPods&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My &lt;a href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/2005/12/ipod-video.html"&gt;fifth generation iPod Video&lt;/a&gt; works flawlessly with the iPod Hi-Fi, a new function called Speakers apears in new iPods, and you can choose between 3 EQ settings, and display "large" album art from music on your iPod.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;And your Mac too&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It will connect optically to other said eqipped devices, like your Airport Express or optical audio output from your cd player, dvd or Mac. It will accept a well aimed stereo min jack too, if you can afford to lose the digital connection, but makes it extremely useful.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;One week on, all is groovy&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am listening to some great music while writing this review. This device is perfect for my lifestyle, yeah mon, bring on the dub, reggae, rock, blues, indie and all that jazz, sounding sweet on my stereo speaker and &lt;strong&gt;my neighbours don't want to kill me!&lt;/strong&gt; Which makes it sound even sweeter. Peace.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Verdict: It's a Boom Box&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Done by Apple. Sure, &lt;strong&gt;it ROCKS&lt;/strong&gt;. Respect.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://tracker.tradedoubler.com/click?p=2554&amp;amp;a=132234g=32244&amp;amp;url=http://store.apple.com/Apple/WebObjects/ukstore?family=iPod"&gt;Buy the iPod Hi-Fi&lt;/a&gt; from the UK Apple Store.&lt;/p&gt;</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16199931/115160044240579438" rel="service.edit" title="Fatman iTube iPod Valve Amplifier" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<author>
<name>Richard Senior</name>
</author>
<issued>2006-06-29T17:29:00+01:00</issued>
<modified>2006-06-29T17:54:44Z</modified>
<created>2006-06-29T17:00:42Z</created>
<link href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/2006/06/fatman-itube-ipod-valve-amplifier.html" rel="alternate" title="Fatman iTube iPod Valve Amplifier" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16199931.post-115160044240579438</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Fatman iTube iPod Valve Amplifier</title>
<content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/" xml:space="preserve">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<img alt="iTube" src="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/i/stuff/itube-fatman-tla-ipod.jpg" title="iTube iPod Valve Amplifier from Fatman TLA"/>
<h3>Fatman iTube iPod Amplifier</h3>
<p>This looks like being a really cool product. It combines 2 things that I am fond of: the <a href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/2005/12/ipod-video.html">Apple iPod</a>, and Valve (aka Tube) amplifiers.</p>
<p>Valves are magical things, don't get me wrong -  I love digital, low voltage circuits. I don't think a valve powered iPod would be a great idea. Yet when used in amplifiers, they do something to the sound, that engineers have struggled to emulate with transistors and software. Logic Pro's Guitar Amp Pro and N.I's Guitar Rig, do a pretty good emulation. But if you heard a nice tube amp, like a Class A Vox AC30, Fender, Marshall or one of the boutique, hand-wired varieties being used in anger, you would soon realise that nothing quite gets that 'brown' sound, like a tube amp.</p>
<p>So, a remote-controlled, valve powered amplifier and iPod dock, is getting me very excited. It's made by Fatman, part of Pro Audio group TL Audio, so I would <em>expect</em> good things from them. I haven't had a chance to listen to them yet, but my bet is that the iTube and a decent pair of monitor speakers would be a very sweet sounding combo. Not quite as portable as an <a href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/2006/03/ipod-hi-fi-boom-box.html">Apple iPod Hi-Fi</a>, but <em>probably</em> a very sweet sound. We'll have to wait and see when the iTube starts shipping next month.</p>
<h3>iTube Features</h3>
<ul>
<li>iTube Vacuum Tube Amplifier</li>
<li>iTube Docking Station</li>
<li>Brush / Glove for cleaning</li>
<li>Power cable</li>
<li>Audio cable to connect Docking Station and Amplifier</li>
<li>Banana Plug speaker cables</li>
<li>Aux source audio cable for connecting CD player etc</li>
<li>Video cable to connect from docking station to TV</li>
<li>Power Output 13Wx2</li>
<li>Frequency Response 20Hz - 20KHz (±1.5Db)</li>
<li>Harmonic Distortion 0.5%</li>
<li>Signal-To-Noise Ratio 86Db</li>
<li>Input Impedance 100K</li>
<li>Output Impedance 4ohm, 8ohm</li>
<li>Valve Type 2x6N1(ECC85) 1x6E2(EM87)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Fat Links</h3>
<p>
<a href="http://www.macidol.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=49600">Fatman iTube Discussion</a>
<br/>
<a href="http://www.fat-man.co.uk/">Fatman Site</a>
</p>
</div>
</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16199931/114599520305413974" rel="service.edit" title="Tangle Tamers i-springs" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<author>
<name>Richard Senior</name>
</author>
<issued>2006-04-25T20:20:00+01:00</issued>
<modified>2006-04-25T20:35:15Z</modified>
<created>2006-04-25T20:00:03Z</created>
<link href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/2006/04/tangle-tamers-i-springs.html" rel="alternate" title="Tangle Tamers i-springs" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16199931.post-114599520305413974</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Tangle Tamers i-springs</title>
<content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/" xml:space="preserve">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<img alt="i-springs" src="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/i/stuff/tangle-tamers-i-springs.jpg" title="Tangle Tamers i-springs iPod headphone springs"/>
<h3>Tangle Tamers i-springs</h3>
<p>It's easy to spot an iPod user, they usually have the stock white buds. Fashion editors and muggers love the white leads, which are not as bad as many hi-fi anoraks will have you believe. They do have one problem though, they can tangle easily. I haven't had too much of a problem, just a minor inconvenience. Tangle Tamers i-springs are a simple dual spring device that make the standard iPod buds and many other headphones, slinky, funky and tangle free.</p>
<h3>Made in Britain</h3>
<p>The iPod was designed by a Briton - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Ive" title="Jonathan Ive does the Wiki">Jonathan Ive</a>,  ( <a href="http://www.macidol.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5440">George W</a> did NOT design the iPod ). So it seems rather fitting that some other Britons have developed something that can actually <em>improve</em> your iPod experience. It refreshingly doesn't <a href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/2006/03/ipod-hi-fi-boom-box.html" title="iPod Hi-Fi">cost more</a> than an <a href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/2005/12/ipod-video.html" title="Fifth generation iPod review">iPod</a> itself.</p>
<h3>i-springs a go go</h3>
<p>The Tangle Tamers slide over your existing headphones and give them a pliable feel that helps stop them tangling up and also makes them seem more expensive than they really are. Available in a variety of hot colours including Metal Guru, Purple Haze or my conservative choice of Purely White, they jazz up your phones and are a lot of fun. At about the same cost as a set of guitar strings they are cheap, cheerful and very useful.</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.tangletamers.com" title="Learn more or buy Tangle Tamers i-springs">Learn more</a> about the Tangle Tamers i-springs or join in the <a href="http://www.macidol.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=45464">discussion</a>.</p>
</div>
</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16199931/114164822413743602" rel="service.edit" title="iPod nano 1GB" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<author>
<name>Richard Senior</name>
</author>
<issued>2006-03-06T11:48:00+00:00</issued>
<modified>2006-03-06T19:06:50Z</modified>
<created>2006-03-06T12:30:24Z</created>
<link href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/2006/03/ipod-nano-1gb.html" rel="alternate" title="iPod nano 1GB" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16199931.post-114164822413743602</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">iPod nano 1GB</title>
<content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/" xml:space="preserve">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<img alt="iPod nano 1GB" src="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/i/stuff/ipod-nano-1gb-review.jpg" title="Apple iPod nano 1GB review"/>
<h3>Apple iPod nano 1GB review</h3>
<p>The <a href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/2005/09/apple-ipod-nano.html">Apple iPod nano</a> was introduced, just in time for the holiday season in September 2005. It replaced the iPod mini, which up until that point had been Apple's best selling variety of iPod. The Apple nano 1GB is the latest and cutest iPod on the block. Yet, despite what it lacks in size it more than makes up for in quality and value. Compared to the current largest iPod - the 60GB iPod with video. The nano lacks video support but very little else. The 1GB nano will only hold about 240 songs but in most situations the iPod nano's diminutive size and weight are a real advantage when compared to it's larger siblings.</p>
<h3>Small but perfectly formed</h3>
<p>Yes, size matters and when it comes to personal music players, size is everything. Will it fit in your pocket? A regular iPod will in most; a nano will fit anywhere. It is lighter than helium, but there is nothing light weight about it's feature set. It will play back audio of the following types:  AAC (16 to 320 Kbps), Protected AAC (from iTunes Music Store), MP3 (16 to 320 Kbps), MP3 VBR, Audible (formats 2, 3 and 4), Apple Lossless, WAV, AIFF. So it will keep music producers and regular listeners happy. Audio quality is excellent, compared to a 60GB iPod video it may be not quite as well rounded and polished, but there is not a lot in it. For such a lightweight device this is an audio heavyweight.</p>
<h3>What's in the box?</h3>
<p>No dock or charger - just like the iPod Video but not such a great surprise as this is a lot more affordable than a 60GB iPod video. The nano comes with a slim vinyl case, ear buds, ear bud covers, usb lead, iPod dock adapter, stickers, quick start guide and CD installer.</p>
<img alt="iPod nano 1GB box" src="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/i/stuff/ipod-nano-1gb-box.jpg" title="iPod nano - box contents. Ear buds, USB lead, Dock insert, ear bud sleeves and grey slip case and 1GB iPod nano."/>
<h3>Now Playing</h3>
<p>Despite the nano's impossibly small form factor I found it very easy to use ergonomically. The 1.5 inch display is a delight, showing 176 x 132 crisp and clean pixels. When lit, the display is bright and clear; otherwise it's very difficult to read. In actual use though I found it to be lovely and surprisingly vivid. The nano is a brisk little performer too. It seems faster loader and updating than the 60GB video iPod. This is probably due to it's solid-state flash memory of the nano. Regular iPods use a miniature Hard Drive, like a smaller version of the one inside your PC or Mac. These use moving parts and are susceptible to failure. The flash memory should prove very reliable on the nano, and it is this technology that has made it possible to make such a small but powerful music player. It uses less power than a mini hard drive, hence the iPod nano's small footprint.</p>
<h3>Sporty Pod</h3>
<p>It is also useful for the lock feature and also for the Stopwatch function, which seeing as the nano is so small and light, could make the nano the choice for anyone who is into sports: athlete, cyclist, or anybody who likes to time something. </p>
<h3>iPod nano 1GB conclusion</h3>
<p>The 1GB iPod nano is currently the smallest and cheapest variety of nano. It will only hold about 240 tunes but this is not too much of a problem as you can always make your own playlists to "Auto-Fill" your iPod with the best music on your iTunes library. It doesn't have the shuffle's Autofill option though, which will as the name suggests, ll your iPod with it's max of songs automatically. I prefer to create playlists though, and this slight drawback in comparison to the shuffle is it's superb screen. The nano is altogether prettier and more expensive looking to use than the shuffle. The shuffle is a pure out and out music player. This minimalism could very well agree with erm, minimalists and purists but I prefer having to option to see what was playing, view my contacts, calendar, pictures, and play games, read notes and books.</p>
<h3>iPod shoot out</h3>
<p>If money is tight, then a shuffle  is the best iPod, if you can stretch to a nano, you get a lot more of the whole iPod experience with one. What it lacks in features is more than augmented by it's ever so lovely size and lack of weight. Arguably the best iPod Apple make is the nano. It won't hold all your tunes, play videos, record audio and other cool things that a 5th generation iPod will allow, but it's trump card is it's size. It's perfectly small but not throwaway like a shuffle, it could be your new best friend.</p>
</div>
</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16199931/114130783263308504" rel="service.edit" title="iPod Hi-Fi Boom Box" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<author>
<name>Richard Senior</name>
</author>
<issued>2006-03-02T12:20:00+00:00</issued>
<modified>2006-03-02T15:27:10Z</modified>
<created>2006-03-02T13:57:12Z</created>
<link href="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/2006/03/ipod-hi-fi-boom-box.html" rel="alternate" title="iPod Hi-Fi Boom Box" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16199931.post-114130783263308504</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">iPod Hi-Fi Boom Box</title>
<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:base="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/music/" xml:space="preserve">&lt;img src="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/i/stuff/ipod-hifi-boom-box.jpg" alt="iPod HiFi" title="Apple iPod Hi-Fi Boom Box" /&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;Apple iPod Hi-Fi - Boom Box Announced&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2006/feb/28hifi.html"&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; their latest addition to their iPod range - the &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/ipodhifi/ "&gt;iPod Hi-Fi&lt;/a&gt;. Marketed as "Home stereo. Reinvented." by Apple, although some of us might &lt;a href="http://www.macidol.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5098" title="iPod Hi-Fi discussion"&gt;disagree&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;Hi-Fi or Lo-Fi?&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple have made a big deal about the audio quality of the iPod Hi-Fi. I haven't even heard one yet, so it really is unfair to comment, but I will anyway. I spent a very horrible time in Apple's Regent Street store recently. What struck me was how shabby the shop was. I know it is extremely popular shop, but I suspect they could afford a cleaner. Sue and I were followed around the shop by 3 burly Apple bouncers which did not help with the retail experience either. I tried out all the iPod Boom Box's on display. The only one that I thought sounded good was the Bose SoundDock Digital Music System. Not amazing, by any stretch of the imagination, but good for it's form factor - but at a price. Having said that the London Apple Store is not great from an acoustic point of view either, which astounds me as music is such a large part of Apple's business.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.ipresents.co.uk/i/stuff/apple-ipod-hi-fi-boom-box.jpg" alt="iPod Hi-Fi" title="Apple iPod Hi-Fi with speaker cover removed." /&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;Woofers and Tweeters, Sir?&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The iPod Hi-Fi looks very much like the centre channel of a home cinema system. It consists of a 130-mm (5 inch) "sub-woofer" which does not look earth shattering from a bass point of view, and 2 x 80-mm (3 inch) "wide-range" speakers. Apple describe the iPod Hi-Fi as "Introducing the stereo for the new century. With several patents pending, iPod Hi-Fi features innovative acoustic design wrapped inside an astounding form factor. And as your ears will attest, good things really do come in small packages." So Apple could well have pulled off something special from an acoustic point of view. I suspect that the stereo separation will be quite poor however.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;Portability&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The iPod Hi-Fi is a one piece unit and has built in carrying handles, but I wouldn't call it portable. It will run off 6 D Batteries, but I wouldn't fancy walking around with this on my shoulder. I don't think the iPod dock idea is really suited for this purpose either, neither does &lt;a href="http://www.macidol.com/jamroom/bands/388/"&gt;B&amp;amp;Massa&lt;/a&gt; "The ipod dock is an appalling piece of design for a device intended to be semi-portable, and looks like an erect, rectangular penis sticking out of a giant, swollen, cuboid scrotum."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It produces a healthy maximum peak sound pressure level of 108 dB at 1 m (AC) or 102 dB at 1 m on battery power. It will be interesting to see how well this device performs in real life though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;What's in the box?&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;iPod Hi-Fi and removable grille&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Apple Remote&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;10 iPod Universal Dock Adapters&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;AC power cord&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Product documentation and user guide&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;What &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; have been in the box...&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Built in Airport Airtunes receiver&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A built in radio preferably DAB - you can't use the iPod Radio Remote using the Hi-Fi dock!&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;iPod Hi-Fi Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The iPod Hi-Fi is not a product I was expecting from Apple. Neither was the iPod Radio. It has an interesting design but I think it is flawed in several areas. It is incredibly expensive and offers nothing truly remarkable. We will have to see if it's sound quality makes up for any other short-falls though. I like the analogue/digital aux input, the small form factor, but for this price it should have had a DAB radio and a built in Air Tunes reciever.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;iPod Hi-Fi Resources&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://tracker.tradedoubler.com/click?p=2554&amp;a=132234
g=32244&amp;url=http://store.apple.com/Apple/WebObjects/ukstore?family=iPod" title="Buy the iPod Hi-Fi from the Official UK Apple Store and help support iPresents"&gt;UK Apple Store&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.macidol.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5098" title="iPod Hi-Fi discussion"&gt;iPod Hi-Fi Discussion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/ipodhifi/"&gt;Apple's iPod Hi-Fi Site&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2006/feb/28hifi.html"&gt;Apple iPod Press Release&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
</feed>
